Links
Home
Oracle DBA Forum
Frequent Oracle Errors
TNS:could not resolve the connect identifier specified
Backtrace message unwound by exceptions
invalid identifier
PL/SQL compilation error
internal error
missing expression
table or view does not exist
end-of-file on communication channel
TNS:listener unknown in connect descriptor
insufficient privileges
PL/SQL: numeric or value error string
TNS:protocol adapter error
ORACLE not available
target host or object does not exist
invalid number
unable to allocate string bytes of shared memory
resource busy and acquire with NOWAIT specified
error occurred at recursive SQL level string
ORACLE initialization or shutdown in progress
archiver error. Connect internal only, until freed
snapshot too old
unable to extend temp segment by string in tablespace
Credential retrieval failed
missing or invalid option
invalid username/password; logon denied
unable to create INITIAL extent for segment
out of process memory when trying to allocate string bytes
shared memory realm does not exist
cannot insert NULL
TNS:unable to connect to destination
remote database not found'>ora-02019
exception encountered: core dump
inconsistent datatypes
no data found
TNS:operation timed out
PL/SQL: could not find program
existing state of packages has been discarded
maximum number of processes exceeded
error signaled in parallel query server
ORACLE instance terminated. Disconnection forced
TNS:packet writer failure
see ORA-12699
missing right parenthesis
name is already used by an existing object
cannot identify/lock data file
invalid file operation
quoted string not properly terminated
Rollback to Undo in a RAC env.

Rollback to Undo in a RAC env.

2004-08-13       - By Daniel W. Fink
Reply:     1     2     3     4     5     6     7     8     9     10     >>  

It is not the number of concurrent users, but the number of concurrent
transactions. The goal of AUM is to assign each transaction to its own
undo segment if there is sufficient space in the undo tablespace. SMON
is responsible for mantaining the undo retention table in each undo
segment header. This maintainence does not necessarily coincide with the
end of a transaction using the particular undo segment. That much we
know for certain.

The theory (formulated by several of us outside of Oracle, so this is
not official) is that SMON becomes overworked when a large number of
undo segments are created by a large number of concurrent transactions.
As new transactions look to bind to an undo segment, they are unable to
find an 'available ' undo segment (as indicated by the segment header),
so they create a new segment since there is sufficient space. This only
creates more work for an already overworked SMON process, so the problem
snowballs. In extreme cases, we have seen the number of undo segments to
be 20x the maximum number of concurrent transactions. The final result
in some cases is that the database begins to throw 600 and 7445 errors
and finally takes a hard crash.

I have also heard the recommendation against AUM in high volume OLTP
systems from a very credible Oracle source.

Regards,
Daniel Fink

ryan.gaffuri@(protected) wrote:

>daniel,
>I Have not seen this anywhere. Why avoid undo tablespaces in high transaction oltps? Do you mean just with RAC? My last project had 30,000 users and a 4 node rac cluster.
>This one is up to about 400,000 without RAC and will go to 3,000,000. Why shouldn 't we use AUM?
>
>

-- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@(protected)
put 'unsubscribe ' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- --